Golf Cart Wizard
Cartaholic - V.I.P.
Golf cart headlights for the longest time have not been much better than a pair of candles slapped up front, however with modern advancements in LED technology as well as the introduction of the Club Car Tempo which was designed with factory headlamp mounting provisions, a plethora of new lighting options have entered the market. I've tried several and noticed wildly varying performance, as well as heard rants and raves from others about some of the different light kits so I wanted to do some real side by side testing to settle things with data.
I recently moved into a larger shop which provided perfect controlled testing environment, so I purchased a Klein ET130 light meter, marked the wall and floor, and got to work. I will be testing from two positions. One spot is roughly 10' from the wall, which has been marked with a "bright line" 22" above the ground, and a "cut line" 28" high These lines will serve more as a guideline as there are many other factors not controlled in this test as the lights were frankly so far apart in performance it really wasn't necessary. If a headlamp is mounted at a significantly different height I will adjust the line height accordingly. Now I will be judging the lights in this test for their performance as "low beam" headlights, as most golf carts are going to be operated in public areas. I emphasize this because it seems like most people these days have no idea what a "low" and "high" beam even is. It's right in the name for Christ's sake! It's supposed to be one beam pointed LOW and a separate beam pointed HIGH, it's not called a bright beam and a dim beam! Regardless of reality, none of the lights tested (in their unmodified form) provided a distinct beam between high and low, they only produced the same beam pattern at a different output level. Dimming a light that is shining into other people's eyes doesn't make anything better, it simply reduces your own visibility! That is what my 28" "cut line" is for. Any significant amount of light shining above this line is glare going into the eyes of oncoming drivers and will result in a lower ranking. The "bright line" represents where the brightest point of the hot spot/cut off should be around. The 2x4s also provide a great reference point, as each successive beam makes a good representation of the spread from directly ahead, next lane over, and down in the ditch. The photos were taken with the camera on a tripod set to manual ISO and exposure to accurately depict the brightness difference between different lamps.
The second test involves backing up the golf cart and measuring the light output on the ground at 5' intervals up to 65' in front of the golf cart. Now I will say this testing is pretty simple as I only have so much time and basic test equipment, the readings are not scientific but provide a good comparison point between all the lights tested in this setting. One thing to note when looking at the results is brighter isn't always better. People seem to think more light=see better, but they forget about contrast. Increasing the brightness of certain objects only makes others appear dimmer. The same problem happens with bright street lights, people think the brighter light reduces crime but in reality it can also create darker shadows for the criminals to hide in. Too much light too close in front of the vehicle will cause you to focus too much on what you are about to crash into instead of up ahead on what you should avoid crashing into. That is why on some automobiles the low beams will actually turn off when you select high beam, and why on some modified headlights you will see later I actually reduced the low beam output when "high" is selected. Lamps that shine too brightly too close in front of the golf cart will actually lose points.
Now the ratings will be largely subjective but do have data to back them up in the form of lux readings. This testing will also only consider the performance of the headlight itself. Other aspects such as quality or taillight performance will not be considered now, but may be in future testing. I will say that I purchased all of the tested products through wholesale sources so quality in particular won't be evaluated too harshly as QC standards often vary greatly between sources. I will make note of any major issues I encountered though. I will also say literally every single headlamp tested would have received a failing grade without some kind of modification, which was largely due to the fact none of them provided provisions for aim, and were often wildly out of spec when installed as intended. Now I didn't see the point in having a test where everyone lost, and aim modifications are something that really wouldn't be that difficult for the average person to figure out so the headlights will be ranked with proper aim. Other more significant modifications that require wizardry to pull off will not be eligible for consideration, but will be discussed to show how the tested products could be improved.
I have decided the best way to represent the performance was with an IIHS style "Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Poor" rating scale. Solely the headlight performance will be evaluated for 3 considerations: Beam pattern, Glare, and Color. A headlamp which receives a "Poor" rating in ANY category will not be eligible to place above one which received no "Poor" ratings. The categories will be assigned by the following characteristics.
Glare
Good: no light exceeding 10 lux above high mark. No odd glare spots
Acceptable: some light exceeding 10 lux just above high mark (none on left side posts). Some glare spots not exceeding 10 lux outside of typical field of view.
Marginal: some light exceeding 10 lux just above high mark (none on left side posts). some glare spots exceeding 10 lux however glare is mostly controlled.
Poor: no glare control. Light well in excess of 10 lux at high mark, consistent readings above 10 lux well above high mark.
Beam:
Good: good distance and side illumination without excessive foreground illumination.
Acceptable: good side illumination, no excessive foreground lighting, some distance illumination
Marginal: some distance illumination
Poor: negligible distance illumination
Color:
Good: pure white with good CRI
Acceptable: slight color shift with usable CRI
Marginal: Noticeable color shift, some colors muted
Poor: heavy coloration, object colors illuminated by lamps are heavily distorted
If the products tested are improved or other lights are requested for testing I will update the results, however like IIHS's testing the testing metrics will become more stringent as more light kits can pass the current testing, and other categories will begin to be considered for evaluation.
I recently moved into a larger shop which provided perfect controlled testing environment, so I purchased a Klein ET130 light meter, marked the wall and floor, and got to work. I will be testing from two positions. One spot is roughly 10' from the wall, which has been marked with a "bright line" 22" above the ground, and a "cut line" 28" high These lines will serve more as a guideline as there are many other factors not controlled in this test as the lights were frankly so far apart in performance it really wasn't necessary. If a headlamp is mounted at a significantly different height I will adjust the line height accordingly. Now I will be judging the lights in this test for their performance as "low beam" headlights, as most golf carts are going to be operated in public areas. I emphasize this because it seems like most people these days have no idea what a "low" and "high" beam even is. It's right in the name for Christ's sake! It's supposed to be one beam pointed LOW and a separate beam pointed HIGH, it's not called a bright beam and a dim beam! Regardless of reality, none of the lights tested (in their unmodified form) provided a distinct beam between high and low, they only produced the same beam pattern at a different output level. Dimming a light that is shining into other people's eyes doesn't make anything better, it simply reduces your own visibility! That is what my 28" "cut line" is for. Any significant amount of light shining above this line is glare going into the eyes of oncoming drivers and will result in a lower ranking. The "bright line" represents where the brightest point of the hot spot/cut off should be around. The 2x4s also provide a great reference point, as each successive beam makes a good representation of the spread from directly ahead, next lane over, and down in the ditch. The photos were taken with the camera on a tripod set to manual ISO and exposure to accurately depict the brightness difference between different lamps.
The second test involves backing up the golf cart and measuring the light output on the ground at 5' intervals up to 65' in front of the golf cart. Now I will say this testing is pretty simple as I only have so much time and basic test equipment, the readings are not scientific but provide a good comparison point between all the lights tested in this setting. One thing to note when looking at the results is brighter isn't always better. People seem to think more light=see better, but they forget about contrast. Increasing the brightness of certain objects only makes others appear dimmer. The same problem happens with bright street lights, people think the brighter light reduces crime but in reality it can also create darker shadows for the criminals to hide in. Too much light too close in front of the vehicle will cause you to focus too much on what you are about to crash into instead of up ahead on what you should avoid crashing into. That is why on some automobiles the low beams will actually turn off when you select high beam, and why on some modified headlights you will see later I actually reduced the low beam output when "high" is selected. Lamps that shine too brightly too close in front of the golf cart will actually lose points.
Now the ratings will be largely subjective but do have data to back them up in the form of lux readings. This testing will also only consider the performance of the headlight itself. Other aspects such as quality or taillight performance will not be considered now, but may be in future testing. I will say that I purchased all of the tested products through wholesale sources so quality in particular won't be evaluated too harshly as QC standards often vary greatly between sources. I will make note of any major issues I encountered though. I will also say literally every single headlamp tested would have received a failing grade without some kind of modification, which was largely due to the fact none of them provided provisions for aim, and were often wildly out of spec when installed as intended. Now I didn't see the point in having a test where everyone lost, and aim modifications are something that really wouldn't be that difficult for the average person to figure out so the headlights will be ranked with proper aim. Other more significant modifications that require wizardry to pull off will not be eligible for consideration, but will be discussed to show how the tested products could be improved.
I have decided the best way to represent the performance was with an IIHS style "Good, Acceptable, Marginal, Poor" rating scale. Solely the headlight performance will be evaluated for 3 considerations: Beam pattern, Glare, and Color. A headlamp which receives a "Poor" rating in ANY category will not be eligible to place above one which received no "Poor" ratings. The categories will be assigned by the following characteristics.
Glare
Good: no light exceeding 10 lux above high mark. No odd glare spots
Acceptable: some light exceeding 10 lux just above high mark (none on left side posts). Some glare spots not exceeding 10 lux outside of typical field of view.
Marginal: some light exceeding 10 lux just above high mark (none on left side posts). some glare spots exceeding 10 lux however glare is mostly controlled.
Poor: no glare control. Light well in excess of 10 lux at high mark, consistent readings above 10 lux well above high mark.
Beam:
Good: good distance and side illumination without excessive foreground illumination.
Acceptable: good side illumination, no excessive foreground lighting, some distance illumination
Marginal: some distance illumination
Poor: negligible distance illumination
Color:
Good: pure white with good CRI
Acceptable: slight color shift with usable CRI
Marginal: Noticeable color shift, some colors muted
Poor: heavy coloration, object colors illuminated by lamps are heavily distorted
If the products tested are improved or other lights are requested for testing I will update the results, however like IIHS's testing the testing metrics will become more stringent as more light kits can pass the current testing, and other categories will begin to be considered for evaluation.